This patent had ► Log In grant time compared to others in this category.
Patent grant time can be influenced by many factors. Activities within the USPTO that are beyond the control of patent attornies can influence grant time, but short grant times can also indicate well-written patents and dedicated efforts to respond rapidly to USPTO office actions with strong arguments. Shorter grant times are preferable, and the scores for this section are inverse measures — higher scores are better.
This patent has ► Log In claims compared to others in this category.
The number of claims in a patent is correlated with its strength. Because greater claim counts increase the cost of a patent, more claims can indicate the importance an applicant assigns to a patent. Importantly, some may elect to file claims across multiple patents. A higher score in this metric indicates more claims, relative to others in this category.
This patent has received ► Log In citations from other patents, than others in this category.
Citations from other patents are an important measure of the significance of a patent. More citations indicate that other technologies build on a patent. Higher scores in this metric are better, and indicate more citations from other patents.
This patent referenced ► Log In citations to other patents, than others in this category.
A lower number of citations to other patents can be a sign of diminished patent strength. More citations indicate dependence on more other technologies. Higher scores in this category are better, and indicate fewer citations to other patents.
This patent has ► Log In proximity to basic research compared to others in this category.
Proximity to basic research is measured by comparing the number of citations to non-patent literature among a cohort of patents. Because most non-patent citations are primary research papers, a higher count indicates greater proximity to basic research.
|6,249,793||Mostly concurrent compaction in a garbage collection system|
|6,173,294||Method for combining card marking with remembered set for generational garbage collection with more than two generations|
|6,098,089||Generation isolation system and method for garbage collection|
|5,953,736||Write barrier system and method including pointer-specific instruction variant replacement mechanism|
|5,845,298||Write barrier system and method for trapping garbage collection page boundary crossing pointer stores|
|8,412,971||Method and apparatus for cache control|
|8,255,922||Mechanism for enabling multiple processes to share physical memory|
|8,131,955||Ephemeral garbage collection using a tracking mechanism on a card table to determine marked bundles|
|7,882,505||Method and apparatus for switching between per-thread and per-processor resource pools in multi-threaded programs|
|7,650,350||Method and apparatus for concurrently processing remembered sets in a space-incremental garbage collector|
|7,565,499||Method and apparatus for recording modified reference locations in garbage-collected heap memory|
|7,412,580||Concurrent incremental garbage collector with a card table summarizing modified reference locations|
|7,313,566||Method and apparatus for isolating selected heap objects using a faulting address trap|
|7,284,108||Systems and methods for multiprocessor scalable write barrier|
|7,272,695||Hot-card caching to avoid excessive remembered-set updating|
|7,225,439||Combining write-barriers within an inner loop with fixed step|
|7,058,670||Scalable, space-efficient, parallel remembered-sets|
|7,039,664||Combining entries in a card object table|
|6,965,905||Lock-free, parallel remembered sets|
|6,928,460||Method and apparatus for performing generational garbage collection in a segmented heap|