This patent had ► Log In grant time compared to others in this category.
Patent grant time can be influenced by many factors. Activities within the USPTO that are beyond the control of patent attornies can influence grant time, but short grant times can also indicate well-written patents and dedicated efforts to respond rapidly to USPTO office actions with strong arguments. Shorter grant times are preferable, and the scores for this section are inverse measures — higher scores are better.
This patent has ► Log In claims compared to others in this category.
The number of claims in a patent is correlated with its strength. Because greater claim counts increase the cost of a patent, more claims can indicate the importance an applicant assigns to a patent. Importantly, some may elect to file claims across multiple patents. A higher score in this metric indicates more claims, relative to others in this category.
This patent has received ► Log In citations from other patents, than others in this category.
Citations from other patents are an important measure of the significance of a patent. More citations indicate that other technologies build on a patent. Higher scores in this metric are better, and indicate more citations from other patents.
This patent referenced ► Log In citations to other patents, than others in this category.
A lower number of citations to other patents can be a sign of diminished patent strength. More citations indicate dependence on more other technologies. Higher scores in this category are better, and indicate fewer citations to other patents.
This patent has ► Log In proximity to basic research compared to others in this category.
Proximity to basic research is measured by comparing the number of citations to non-patent literature among a cohort of patents. Because most non-patent citations are primary research papers, a higher count indicates greater proximity to basic research.
|6,683,697||Information processing methodology|
|6,611,598||Self-authentication of value documents using encoded indices|
|6,574,377||Electronic check image storage and retrieval system|
|6,431,439||System and method for the electronic storage and transmission of financial transactions|
|6,390,362||Method and device for preventing check fraud|
|6,384,844||Method and apparatus for use in entering financial data into an electronic device|
|6,370,266||Financial document processing system and method of operating a financial document processing system to verify zone coordinates|
|6,366,956||Relevance access of Internet information services|
|6,363,162||System and process for assessing the quality of a signature within a binary image|
|6,338,049||User-generated traveler|s checks|
|6,317,745||Trusted third party data structure for electronic funds transfer and bill presentment|
|6,301,379||Electronic check presentment systems and methods employing volatile memory datastore access techniques|
|6,073,121||Check fraud prevention system|
|6,070,141||System and method of assessing the quality of an identification transaction using an identificaion quality score|
|6,032,137||Remote image capture with centralized processing and storage|
|5,956,700||System and method for paying bills and other obligations including selective payor and payee controls|
|5,832,464||System and method for efficiently processing payments via check and electronic funds transfer|
|5,819,291||Matching new customer records to existing customer records in a large business database using hash key|
|9,336,437||Segregation of handwritten information from typographic information on a document|
|9,082,007||Image recreation using templates|
|8,121,950||Method of processing a check and an apparatus therefor|
|7,983,468||Method and system for extracting information from documents by document segregation|
|7,920,742||Image processing apparatus, program and recording medium for document registration|
|7,020,320||Extracting text written on a check|